Sons of the Oak

David Farland

You are here: Home - Uncategorized - Sons of the Oak


Sons of the Oak

Sons of the Oak Sons of the Oak The Runelords Book

  • Title: Sons of the Oak
  • Author: David Farland
  • ISBN: 9780765301772
  • Page: 388
  • Format: Hardcover
  • Sons of the Oak The Runelords, Book 5

    • ☆ Sons of the Oak || ✓ PDF Download by Ú David Farland
      388 David Farland
    • thumbnail Title: ☆ Sons of the Oak || ✓ PDF Download by Ú David Farland
      Posted by:David Farland
      Published :2019-01-26T20:46:53+00:00

    One thought on “Sons of the Oak

    1. Angie on said:

      David Farland is a master at his craft. I have never read anything by any other author that is as effectively descriptive as this book. I read the first four books of the series a few years ago, and I distinctly remember feeling sick to my stomach quite a bit while reading. Part of it was the Runelords culture: weakening someone else to make someone stronger, killing the weaklings to make the Runelords weaker.But it is Farland's use of words that makes me respond physically. His description of h [...]

    2. Paul Schulzetenberg on said:

      David Farland continues his Runelords series, but introduces a new generation with new heroes, and new villains. Farland rushes to cut ties with the last book, killing off several familiar characters from the last series within the first 50 pages. He clearly wants us to realize that this is a new series.So, this is a new series, but does it work? Mostly. There are a few familiar faces from the previous series who play large roles in the novel, but the cast of characters is mostly new. Our hero i [...]

    3. David Colpitts on said:

      An interesting read from David Farland. While not reaching the majesty of his previous four books he still manages to enthrall and entertain. This novel finds us with the children of Gaborn, the Earth King, and the subsequent consequences of being his heirs. As well, Fallion, Gaborn's oldest son is an "old soul" one reborn thousands of times throughout history and his purpose for being reborn on this plane of existence.Though I found the pacing to be a little odd in this novel and I found it dif [...]

    4. Boyd on said:

      This one was probably my least favorite book in the series. I just wasn't connecting with the new characters. and it was kind of like 'filler', waiting for something else to happen.

    5. Lance Sherrill on said:

      This would be my favorite in the series if it weren't for all the ridiculous plot holes. Story wise, I have absolutely no complaints. Couldn't put it down. It's almost as if Farland took no notes on his previous books or simply forgot various details. Baron Waggit remembers his name in book four. We never learn it. Borenson is branded with a will forcible. It's never mentioned again. Duke Paldane? Dies twice. Queen Lowicker comes back from the deadere's more but that's all I can remember off han [...]

    6. Jesse Whitehead on said:

      I read the first four books of David Farland’s Runelords series years ago and enjoyed them a lot. I remember finding them exciting and full of fun action scenes and memorable characters, if not the smoothest of prose.Here’s the problem. David Farland writes like a first-time novelist in some ways and like a veteran writing ninja in others. His word choices and awkward sentences feel so contrived and amateur that they are occasionally worthy of a cringe and usually elicit a wince or two.It’ [...]

    7. Jason on said:

      I hate to give bad reviews to books. Honestly this is one of the worst put together books I have read in a long long time. I read similar reviews before trying this one out and thought "Surely they jest." However that isn't the case. I have rarely ever put a book down and not finished it, this one almost made it. I think the saddest thing about this book is that it has such great and unique ideas to build from. Once of the most original magical systems in books in a long time, imho, is what the [...]

    8. Katrina on said:

      I am honestly quite shocked how much this book has drawn me into it. In the first hundred pages, it had me attached to charactersd then killed them off or holding my breath in suspense, thinking "Please don't kill them!" while reading to see what happened. My eyes have fogged with tears, and I've felt with the characters. There is a strange combination of limited narration with omniscient that works well.I've been edging between giving this a 4 and a 5. THe first 200 pages flew by, I didn't know [...]

    9. Alec on said:

      With the fourth book seemingly wrapping up the series I didn't know what to expect in this novel so I approached this installation with equal parts curiosity and worry. By the time I finished the first third of this book I knew I had a few more books to read. A few things changed with the book, obviously the central protagonist has shifted though his influence (though his bloodline) continues to play a central role. Another change is the pacing which was pretty much minute-by-minute in the first [...]

    10. Garrett on said:

      It is always difficult to review a book that is middle in a long series. I obviously like the writing and world enough to keep going. But, I don't want to give anything away for those who haven't started the series yet. I also don't typically review the same things I do in other books (like Setting, Plot, Conflict, Characters, and Text). Instead, I focus on what keep me reading and what knocked me out of the story in general.With book five in this series, Dave is actually starting a new set of a [...]

    11. Lewstherin14 on said:

      No where near as good as the earth king cycle but better than anything Jordan or Tolkien ever touched. The main problem is that Fallion is a borderline Mary Sue whose special powers negate most of deeper moral and ethical decisions built into the mythos. You are supposed to find him a hero because his powers allow him to 'Gordian knot' decisions that would have made for interesting story-lines in the first cycle. The other characters respect him for 'not making their mistakes' but he takes third [...]

    12. Bobby Williams on said:

      Listened to this book on audible, and it is a good continuation to David's Runelord series. Admittedly, this was not my most favorite book overall, however I definitely related to Fallion, one of the main protagonists in the story. He reminds me of my book-in-forever-progress's protagonist a bit, as they have a bit of a similar middle middle story. However, as the story goes, this one is not for the faint of heart in a few spots, and you are either going to be like me and wish there was a little [...]

    13. Jacob Heiner on said:

      This felt significantly different from the previous four Runelords books. While I enjoyed the previous ones, I thought this was better. It feels like Farland get better between writing book 4 and book 5. I feel like this should be considered a separate series, though. This book wasn't incredible, groundbreaking, or anything crazy, but I did enjoy it.

    14. Cristobal on said:

      It's… Becoming a slog. Oh well… Five books in. Might as well finish the series at this point.

    15. Bookworm Smith on said:

      The fifth book of one of those long drawn out fantasy epics. Thousands and thousands of pages, filled with far flung mythical ideas to make the mind escape into another worldwhich I guess is the point of most fantasy books? Luckily, I am into 'hardcore' fantasy. So, this book was a page turner for me. You really need to read the first four books of the Runelords to get the full experience that is offered up in Sons of the Oak. If you recall, the previous books centred around a guy named Gaborn. [...]

    16. Dani on said:

      For some reason I almost see books of these types like cheating (and I’m also aware of what a hypocrite I will become when I finally pick up Brandon Sanderson’s new book The Alloy of Law, but it’s only because I love him most). The problem with a continuation of a series opting for the only change being new characters is that I always feel the author has become lazy. They no longer need to think up new concepts or conflicts, they can recycle what they’ve already written and twist it just [...]

    17. Johnny on said:

      Aside from the average writing, the mediocre characters and the unexceptional story present in all the books of the series, there was another issues with this book that made me wish the author had taken the time to study a little before getting published.It is quite simple, really, something everyone knows, or should. I am talking about the point of view. Any author will tell you that is very important, how you present the story to the readers, through whose eyes. There was even this guide I rea [...]

    18. Kerry on said:

      I listened this book. As with Farland's other books, it is a loonnnggg book with some redundancy, but I love its originality which keeps me working through this series. Farland's detailed, repetitive descriptions can become fatiguing. His world-building is outstanding.This book picked up after Gaborn's death and followed Fallon's young life. It introduced an old enemy in a new form. The use of magic was less prominent in this book when compared to the previous works in this series. I think this [...]

    19. Sara on said:

      The Sons of the Oak was an improvement, I think over the last few books. The first was the best by far, but still, I love this series as a whole. I was skeptical know that this book is all about the sons of Gaborn and he himself is passed. But I was pleased to find Fallion a likable character. It was a little creepy to see Myrrima and Borenson settle down on a farm >.> But I guess they have to bow out somehow. Borenson hasn't any endowments now and Myrrima's not really so strong. I wonder [...]

    20. Kenneth Geary on said:

      OK this is where the series really picks up, not to knock the Earth King section of the series i enjoyed them. However if you are not into slow building of characters and plot you can just read the pages for the first few books and pick up the series here. Farland does an amazing job of building a saga. He has seamlessly moved eight years forward from the previous trilogy of books and introduced us to the Heirs of the Earth King, goes deeper into his universe's history, and we finally get to me [...]

    21. Lawrence Chang on said:

      The Earth King's last warning to his son Fallion:"Learn to love the greedy as well as the generous . . . the poor as much as the rich . . . the evil . . . . Return a blessing for every blow. . . ." I'll never really be that kind and tolerant, but we all have to learn our lessons well. When we're getting old, you know the differences between good and evil seem to be blurred by our age. How noble it is to accept all!

    22. Jenelle on said:

      I wondered after book 4 if I should stop. It was a good place, pretty much everything was resolved, and I was really, really satisfied with how things had turned out.Now I have to finish the rest of the series before I know the answer, because this #5 doesn't really make a strong case either way. Mostly, though, it seems a lot more depressing.The redeeming quality?-- the killer performance in the audiobook. So good.

    23. Morgan Schreffler on said:

      I enjoyed this book a lot. It was a bit too happy of an ending I thought, but still enjoyable. I also found it interesting that Farland changed how time moves in this installment. Books 1-4 spanned a period of roughly two weeks total, while Sons of the Oak spanned about a five-year period (and was shorter in length than any of the first four books). I didn't find this to be a problem; just interesting.

    24. J.A. on said:

      I was fortunate enough to sit between Brandon Sanderson and David Farland at an author signing in November 2006, just after this book was released. Farland said it was the first time he had seen it in its' finished form. I read the first four books in the series after that signing, and I'm just now returning to read the second set of four. Farland is a facilitator when it comes to twisting the knife!

    25. Ben on said:

      A fun continuation of the Runelords series, this book feels more like "Part 1" of a new story arc (which, of course, it is) than a fully self-contained story. Still, it does a good job of introducing us to a new set of characters, problems, and ideas without suffering from Robert Jordan syndrome (i.e everything is TWICE as dangerous as in the last book. Now everything is even MORE dire!) Worth the read if you've been keeping up with Farland's Runelords.

    26. Sarah Staszkiel on said:

      This novel was the point in the series where my interest started to wane. I don't think it was necessarily the books fault entirely. I think I just tend to lose interest once a story moves on to focus on subsequent generations. I build up an emotional investment in the original characters, and when they begin to be left out of the story in favour of their descendents, I just can't really be engaged.Sons of the Oak was a good novel, just not as good as the previous 4.

    27. Powder River Rose on said:

      I've been waiting for a year to find and finish the series; and I'm not disappointed though I found this doesn't have the same strength as the past 4 books. Many of the strong characters have been killed off and the new kids need time to build up intimacy with the readers. It's a bit choppy but I hope it evens out with the next book.

    28. Tiffany Frey on said:

      I didn't think this was as good as the previous ones, not because of content but because it felt rushed. It felt as if there weren't enough details and the outline of the book was filled in with the bare minimum to get the book out. I think it should've been listed as a prequel to Worldbinder, which I am currently reading , and is much better, so far :)

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *