The Murder of King Tut

James Patterson Martin Dugard

You are here: Home - Uncategorized - The Murder of King Tut

The Murder of King Tut

The Murder of King Tut A secret buried for centuriesThrust onto Egypt s most powerful throne at the age of nine King Tut s reign was fiercely debated from the outset Behind the palace s veil of prosperity bitter rivalries

  • Title: The Murder of King Tut
  • Author: James Patterson Martin Dugard
  • ISBN: null
  • Page: 190
  • Format: Kindle Edition
  • A secret buried for centuriesThrust onto Egypt s most powerful throne at the age of nine, King Tut s reign was fiercely debated from the outset Behind the palace s veil of prosperity, bitter rivalries and jealousy flourished among the Boy King s most trusted advisors, and after only nine years, King Tut suddenly perished, his name purged from Egyptian history To this dayA secret buried for centuriesThrust onto Egypt s most powerful throne at the age of nine, King Tut s reign was fiercely debated from the outset Behind the palace s veil of prosperity, bitter rivalries and jealousy flourished among the Boy King s most trusted advisors, and after only nine years, King Tut suddenly perished, his name purged from Egyptian history To this day, his death remains shrouded in controversy The keys to an unsolved mysteryEnchanted by the ruler s tragic story and hoping to unlock the answers to the 3,000 year old mystery, Howard Carter made it his life s mission to uncover the pharaoh s hidden tomb He began his search in 1907, but encountered countless setbacks and dead ends before he finally, uncovered the long lost crypt The clues point to murderNow, in The Murder of King Tut, James Patterson and Martin Dugard dig through stacks of evidence X rays, Carter s files, forensic clues, and stories told through the ages to arrive at their own account of King Tut s life and death The result is an exhilarating true crime tale of intrigue, passion, and betrayal that casts fresh light on the oldest mystery of all.

    • [PDF] ↠ Unlimited ☆ The Murder of King Tut : by James Patterson Martin Dugard Ô
      190 James Patterson Martin Dugard
    • thumbnail Title: [PDF] ↠ Unlimited ☆ The Murder of King Tut : by James Patterson Martin Dugard Ô
      Posted by:James Patterson Martin Dugard
      Published :2018-08-18T09:34:59+00:00

    One thought on “The Murder of King Tut

    1. Kevin on said:

      I'm half way through with the book and like a few of other reviewers have mentioned. soon as I read how much time and effort went into the researching of this book, my cynical side came outI'm thinking don't tell me how much time you put into it but let me gauge that for myself after I've read it.I'm no Egyptologist by any stretch but for a book that has been heavily researched it is definitely light on detailsother thing I don't like is when the author places himself within the storyo, ego & [...]

    2. Aaron on said:

      Put your seat belts on because this is going to be a bumpy review. In all his arrogance, Patterson claims to have done a great deal of research as he and Martin Dugard try to solve the mystery of the boy king, Tutankhamun. This is not non-fiction as it claims to be, but historical fiction. The tale is told on three levels: chapters highlighting how Patterson visited the recent controversial Tut exhibit that toured America a couple of years ago, chapters that introduce readers to the life of arch [...]

    3. Charlie on said:

      UNBELIEVABLE. The worst book I've ever read in my life. Laughably bad. This idiot thinks he was the first to consider that Tutankhamen may have been assassinated, and that he alone has "solved" his murder. I mean I don't think he ACTUALLY believes that, but I do think he believes it's easy as hell fool adults into believing that. Which by the way, is fucking insulting. It's painfully obvious that he considers his adult audience to be dumb as fuck. There are a million "chapters" in this shitty bo [...]

    4. StoryTellerShannon on said:

      Mildly engaging.It mostly goes back and forth between Ancient Egypt and the people who would later discover his hidden tomb. It also focuses on how Tut was murdered and the turmoil happening during his reign. OVERALL GRADE: C plus.

    5. Megan on said:

      This has got to be the most awful book I have read in a long time, if not my entire life. I have never read a James Patterson book, never had an urge. The only reason I picked this one up was because it sounded interesting as an historical novel. He bills this book as a 'non-fiction thriller'. This is complete and utter bulls**t. I was a history major in undergrad. I have read PLENTY of non-fiction books. This is NOT one of them. Patterson is making crap up as he goes along. He's making these re [...]

    6. Kenny on said:

      To say Patterson writes ten books a year is supposed to be a compliment. It shouldn't be.Obviously, his co-writers do most of the work and I suspect in this case Patterson merely wrote the self-serving self-descriptive entries and broke the book down into his famous "two page" chapters, because he thinks his readers are such numbskulls that they cannot concentrate for more than sixty seconds at a time.He may be right, if you judge his readers by the writer. Was Tutankhamun murdered? As an affici [...]

    7. Margaret on said:

      I am not going to glorify this with any stars.I got qualms about it when I came across the tomb building slaves being slaughtered in the desert. As the tomb builders were highly skilled artisans, this was a load of bollocks to start with. Ask John Romer he excavated their village and wrote a book about them. Many of his finds are in the British Museum and I have seen them with my own eyes.When I got to around page 52 and Ay (misspelled Aye) was ogling Nefertiti, only the fact that I had got the [...]

    8. Christopher Saunders on said:

      James Patterson is a perfectly serviceable writer of thrillers and police procedurals. What on Earth possessed him to write a book billing itself as a "nonfiction thriller"? This wretched book, which parallels the short, unhappy reign of King Tutankhamen with Howard Carter's discovery of his tomb, makes obnoxious pretenses to fastidious accuracy ("fake nothing, even a bee sting" Patterson implores in his introduction), yet the actual book offers a thin, lazy caricature of real events. Besides bu [...]

    9. Emrys on said:

      The writing in this book is abysmally poor and the historical inaccuracies were astounding. A certain level of bad writing might be worth overlooking if the plot were especially strong or if recent findings were revealed, but the plot is weak and the premise is not based on any archeological findings. This book is advertised as a nonfiction thriller, but it's really a fictional non-thriller. The author begins the book with much pomp about how the materials were thoroughly researched so that the [...]

    10. Laura on said:

      I always have to remind myself after reading a James Patterson book that I have never liked any of his books so I should stop trying to read them! This book is supposed to be nonfiction and Patterson goes on about how he did so much research for this book, more than he has ever done for any other book. However, none of this research is evident. No footnotes, no end notes, no sources. He also mentions that his assistant did the bulk of the research (so not sure why he claims in other places he di [...]

    11. Mindy on said:

      I have never read any of Patterson's books. I see them every time I go to the library. They're all over the freaking book tables at Costco, and he takes up an entire bloody shelf at Borders. My only thought on an author that produces that many books that quickly is How could all of his books possibly be that good without being repetitive?When I saw this title at Costco, I jumped on it immediately. I've always loved archeology--Egyptian history was the trigger for my passion. So when I saw a book [...]

    12. Jennifer on said:

      I really had high hopes for this book, as I love history and am fascinated with all things Ancient Egypt.but was sorely disappointed. I was expecting something along the lines of Patricia Cornwell's investigation into the Jack the Ripper case, with a summary of evidence and supporting documentation. Patterson fro some reason chose to mask all of his "evidence" with a narrative that comes off as more of a fictionalized account. There are "scenes", including dialogue, between Tut and his family an [...]

    13. Gabrielle on said:

      This is the last time I borrow a book from the library based only on its subject matter before checking first, that's for sure. Though I put this book in my nonfiction shelf because that's how the library sorts it, this book is actually historical fiction. And I use the term historical loosely. Though the author might want us to believe he single-handedly solved the mystery of King Tut's death, his level of research indicates he did far less than that. I do not consider myself well-read in the [...]

    14. Jeanette Bowyer on said:

      A disappointment to Egyptology. I don't believe that the information for this book was researched well enough. A historical non fiction book should have loads of footnotes and references telling the reader where he obtained his information.

    15. Erika on said:

      James Patterson is an arrogant prick and this book is terrible. Terrible, awful, horrible.

    16. Christine on said:

      This book is an insult to every other nonfiction book out there. James Patterson should stick to fiction, although after reading this I won’t be picking up another book by him.I know that James has a following of fans, has been on the bestseller list for always, and puts out quite a few new books each year. He’s a machine. But he’s also arrogant, which is evidenced in his “present day” sections of this book. For example:p. 7 “As I waited for Michael to come on the line – he usually [...]

    17. Natalie on said:

      Priča se izmjenjuje kratkim poglavljima u vrijeme kad je živio Tutankamon i u vrijeme kad ga je ''tražio'' i otkrio Howard Carter. Još i dan danas ostaje misterija kako je mladi jedva 18-est godišnji kralj naglo umro. Patterson smatra da su ga ubili i na tome se i bazira priča (za razliku od stvarnosti gdje znanstvenici imaju tezu da je poginuo ''nesretnim slučajem''). Budući da je njegov smrtni neprijatelj bio svećenik Ay smatra se da ga je on dao ubiti. Budući da nakon Tutankhamonove [...]

    18. Jacquie on said:

      When something describes itself as a "Nonfiction Thriller" you know it's a bad sign. I requested this book because I needed an example of a BAD resource for a presentation. After receiving it I skimmed two pages, which ended up being an ENTIRE chapter. There are actually no words to adequately describe how appallingly horrific this book is. It was so bad I started reading it aloud to my coworker so we could laugh hysterically,:Ankhesenpaaten's face had turned a sickly shade of paleIt was as if T [...]

    19. Tina on said:

      I was disappointed in this book, especially considering what a prolific author Patterson is. I file this under historical fiction, because it most certainly is not nonfiction. While it's clear that Patterson has done some research to lend authenticity to the scenes he creates, his "evidence" and the book in general are severely lacking. I would expect a work that claims to be nonfiction to have citations or footnotes, none here. A high school history essay would be better written and documented. [...]

    20. Jenn on said:

      I think that I can count on one hand the number of times I've put down a book without finishing it. This is one of those books, so some may deem me unqualified to review it. Whatever, I had my reasons.There's a difference between doing research and filling in the pieces with a little fictitious flare and doing what Patterson has done - written a story that's to his liking and filled in historical information when it went along with his own speculation. I don't consider myself an Egyptologist by [...]

    21. Nikki on said:

      The Murder of King Tut has chapters covering the lives of the mysterious boy-king and those around him, the life of Howard Carter, the archaeologist who discovered his body, and a couple of chapters on James Patterson's own writing of the book. It's simple writing, easy to read, and I finished the whole book in an hour. It's a little sensational, of course, and caters to the lowest common denominator -- I don't think Nefertiti would have called Tutankhamen 'Tut', somehow. There were inconsistenc [...]

    22. V. Briceland on said:

      I have never read any of Mr. Patterson's other books, and therefore can't state with certainty that they're all written as if for developmentally-challenged seventh graders. But this one certainly made me feel as if I were reading while riding on the short bus.Mr. Patterson's begins his investigation into the death of everyone's favorite ancient boy king with a prologue reminding readers (in all capital letters) that the role of the historian is never to embellish, but only to illuminate fact. H [...]

    23. Kimberly Wilson on said:

      lolol. I adore the idea of the Free Little Library. But it's filled with books like this one. I took a chance. This book calls itself nonfiction. Can you just do that?? Let me just give you a red flag excerpt: "There was that gut instinct of mine again—the reason, I think, that Time magazine had once called me 'The Man Who Can't Miss.' "That was in the book.

    24. Laura on said:

      My daughter had the book, so I thought I'd give it a whirl. I've not read any James Patterson before, but I know he is a prolific writer/co-writer. This is definitely aimed at middle school kids. I wasn't convinced with his conclusion, but I did find the narrative interesting. Three stars

    25. Taylor on said:

      Review: Egyptology has always fascinated me and it is one of my biggest passions in life, which is why I snatched this book up in a heartbeat! King Tutankhamen (King Tut) is the most fascinating Pharaoh in my opinion because he has mystified us all.Patterson wrote this as a three part story. It is told in present day by Patterson himself where he describes his journey in trying to learn and write about Tut as the boy king. The second story line takes place in the early 1900’s and is told by th [...]

    26. Yuska Vonita on said:

      After watching TUT miniseries (starring Avan Jogia as Tut), I started to read this book. Interesting facts about Akhenaten.UpdatedSaya sudah memiliki buku ini sejak buku ini baru dirilis, tapi baru sempat membacanya dua tahun kemudian (bookhoarder alert.)Gara-gara menonton miniseri Tut, saya mencari-cari buku ini yang berada di tumpukan kontener paling bawah.Tidak seperti karya-karya sebelumnya, James Patterson menggabungkan fakta sejarah dengan fiksi di buku ini. Menarik karena buku ini berceri [...]

    27. Toni on said:

      James Patterson writes mysteries, and he writes them well. However, he claims this book is a “non-fiction thriller.” It reads well and would have been a great page-turner if the claim to non-fiction hadn’t irritated me so much. (Note to Kaydeen: It is actually catalogued in the 932.14s! Personally, I would have considered it fiction--sensational but risky speculation with no reference sources listed.) Even a novice such as I knows no one has discovered with certainty what (or who?) killed [...]

    28. Starling on said:

      I'm marking this as a non-fiction history book because that is what the library said it was. But what it actually is is a very badly written historical novel.James Patterson tends to write books with a lot of different co-authors, and how the book turns out depends to a large extent on who the co-author is. He should avoid Martin Dugard.The book is basically unreadable. I don't think they had enough information to write a real history, so they filled the book with imaginary dialog.The authors ha [...]

    29. Marjorie on said:

      I love books about Egypt, but Patterson tries to pass this off as non fiction after his investigation into what happened to King Tut. There are many historical fiction novels out there that address this mytery and frankly, do a better job. I read a book called "The Egyption" by Mika Waltari. So much better and Waltari was a much better writer. Patterson pumps out so many books that I wouldn't regularly read his novels. This book will disappoint if you don't like mass marketed overproducing autho [...]

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *